A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.

A North Dakota jury awarded $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company that runs the Dakota Access Pipeline, ...

Energy Transfer’s suit against Greenpeace represents the first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate nonprofits that funnel money and material support to the lawbreakers ...

1 TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...

Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...

How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact ...

A North Dakota jury found Greenpeace liable for defamation and other claims brought by a pipeline company Dallas-based Energy ...

James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...

On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...