The decision from a three-judge panel allows the orders to be enforced as a lawsuit challenging them plays out.

By Alfredo Galarza, Alexander Villegas and Riham Alkousaa HUARAZ, Peru (Reuters) - In the high Andes of northern Peru, the ...

Supreme Court of India Judge, Justice B V Nagarathna, emphasized the need for at least 30% representation of women in law ...

An appeals court on Friday lifted a block on executive orders seeking to end government support for diversity, equity and ...

"No, there's not a mechanism. And, the reason is, because cases get dismissed for a number of reasons.," Judge Michelle ...

The Trump administration is threatening funding for federal grantees who don’t comply with anti-DEI executive orders, defying ...

President Donald Trump's administration is expected on Friday to move ahead with a second wave of mass firings and budget ...

A judge blocked the Trump administration from forcing organizations to accept his anti-DEI contract terms. Trump officials haven’t let them know.

Taken as a whole, the rulings represent an effort to thwart President Trump’s serial attempts to increase his power and the ...

“The Court’s refusal to intervene now leaves students subject ... Describing Speech First as a “frequent flier of lawsuits against higher-education institutions,” attorneys for the Indiana school ...

New York Times v. Sullivan and other landmark Supreme Court decisions protect the press’s ability to investigate public ...

The panel of three judges, all of whom were appointed by Democratic presidents, said the federal judge's order is not subject to review by a higher court at this stage of the litigation.