Two federal courts hold the use of copyrighted books by Meta and Anthropic as training data for AI systems does not infringe ...

Her work explores how new AI technology is infiltrating our lives, shaping the content we consume on social media and ...

This is the first time a judge found that an AI company's use of copyrighted material is fair use.

O n Wednesday, the judge in the landmark AI copyright case Kadrey, et al. v. Meta Platforms Inc. ruled in Meta’s favor. And U ...

Five authors accused Anthropic of copying millions of books that were purchased, scanned, and pirated to train the Anthropic ...

A summary of select court decisions addressing whether the use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI (GenAI) tools constitutes fair use.

Judges ruled in favor of Meta and Anthropic over fair use in A.I. training, but future cases may hinge on market harm to ...

A federal judge has sided with Anthropic in an AI copyright case, ruling that training — and only training — its AI models on ...

The federal judge who ruled in Meta’s favor still isn’t convinced its use of copyrighted materials for AI training qualifies ...

A federal judge said Meta and OpenAI's use of copyrighted works to train their Llama and ChatGPT AI model was "fair use." ...

Two US district judges have ruled that training artificial intelligence (AI) models on copyrighted books may amount to fair ...