Trump, Supreme Court and Alien Enemies
Digest more
Top News
Overview
Impacts
NPR |
The court, however, said there is only one way to do that. And that is by challenging their detentions on a case-by-case basis.
The New York Times |
The House passed legislation on Wednesday that would bar federal district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, part of an escalating Republican campaign to take aim at judges who have moved to ...
CNN |
The agencies are a critical bulwark against Trump’s efforts to rapidly reduce the size of the federal workforce and fire thousands of employees.
Read more on News Digest
The spate of recent Supreme Court decisions overturning Trump administration losses in the lower courts are all about saving face—and securing power.
The high court ruled the Trump administration may use a wartime law to deport alleged members of a foreign crime gang, as long as the government’s claim can be challenged.
As President Trump pushes the limits of executive power, the Supreme Court is avoiding confrontation with the White House while flexing its right of judicial review.
March, the Trump administration sent more than 200 alleged members of a Venezuelan gang to El Salvador, using an archaic wartime law to deport many of them without any legal review or due process.
The Supreme Court tossed out an order blocking the Trump administration from deporting migrants under the Alien Enemies Act. Here's what to know.
The power of a single judge to issue a nationwide injunction has become pivotal in the question of whether Trump can quickly implement his aggressive agenda. Several cases either already awaiting action by the Supreme Court or heading toward nine justices involve such a judicial order.
3d
India Today on MSNDMK moves Supreme Court challenging Centre's Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025Act, 2025, calling it unconstitutional. The party claims the law violates Muslim minority rights and was passed without addressing key objections.
Lower courts have already ruled against two foster parents' claims that laws discriminated against them in the adoption process because of their race