A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project. Greenpeace maintains that ...

In a win for the oil and gas pipeline company Energy Transfer, a nine-person North Dakota jury found the environmental group Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages and defamation ...

The environmental group sticking to its principles should serve as model for activism under the second Trump administration ...

The verdict was a major blow to the environmental organization. Greenpeace had said that Energy Transfer’s claimed damages, in the range of $300 million, would be enough to put the group out of ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe ...

A jury in North Dakota ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace in 2019, alleging ...

The environmental group did not respond to a request for comment, but Laura Handman, one of the lawyers on the case, said “this story is not over,” noting that Greenpeace International last month ...

Greenpeace testified that it played only a minor, supporting role in the protests against the pipeline, which it pointed out ...

A North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in connection with protests against the Dakota ...