Still, the Supreme Court's expansive view of presidential power is giving Trump significant leeway -- with potentially more ...

The case is significant because it’s the first racial gerrymandering case to make its way to the Supreme Court since Chief Justice John Roberts invented an entirely new standard for these kinds ...

Politics / The spate of recent Supreme Court decisions overturning Trump administration losses in the lower courts are all about saving face—and securing power. Elie Mystal The best way to ...

The spate of recent Supreme Court decisions overturning Trump administration losses in the lower courts are all about saving face—and securing power. Samuel Alito Jr., associate justice of the ...

The administration did not ask the Supreme Court to hear the case right away, urging it instead to decide the domestic violence case, United States v. Rahimi, No. 22-915, and then consider Mr ...

As President Donald Trump pushes the limits of executive power, the U.S. Supreme Court has begun to reveal how it will respond to calls to push back, so far doing its best to avoid direct ...

Supreme Court limits access to government records in loss for Argus Leader Supreme Court case on South Dakota food stamp data hinges on one word: Confidential Justices grapple with whether food ...

Supreme Court Won’t Hear Cases on High-Powered Rifles and Disarming Felons. ... He admitted in state court in Pennsylvania in 1995 that he had made a false statement to get food stamps.