Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...

A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

The environmental group had said the lawsuit, over its role in a protest movement, could mean an end to its operations in the ...

On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...

This week, a jury in North Dakota found Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. It was a monumental verdict that ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.

If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...

A North Dakota jury awarded $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company that runs the Dakota Access Pipeline, ...

A North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay more than $660 million in connection with protests against the Dakota ...

James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...

Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...