Addressing this case for the third time, the US District Court for the District of Arizona found on remand that Jack Daniel’s was entitled to ...

In wrapping up the 2023-24 term and embarking on the 2024-25 term, the Supreme Court was asked to decide a number of intellectual property cases. The ...

A judge is no longer considering retracting a multi-million-dollar award that rapper T.I. and Tameka “Tiny” Harris were to ...

You are responsible for reading, understanding, and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy ...

Brett Heavner explains the two governing regimes in the United States that pharmaceutical marketers must be aware of – the FDA and the Lanham Act. While the two regimes are not designed to work ...

The athleisure brand filed three separate lawsuits against a group of sellers it alleges is selling fake versions of its ...

Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC, 119 F.4th 711 (9th Cir. 2024) — highlights the limits of trademark protection under the Lanham Act in the context of online keyword searches. Accident Law Group ...

Perplexity, a startup building AI-powered search tools, has been sued in federal court for allegedly violating another ...

In a case that was remanded back by the Supreme Court, a U.S. district court found the toy was a parody that did not infringe on Jack Daniel's trademark, but still tarnished the whiskey brand, noting ...

The judge further cited the Lanham Act. The Lanham Act suggests that it is necessary to prove that a company has willfully infringed on an existing trademark. Enacted in 1946 by Congress ...

False advertising generally involves either a false claim of origin or a false claim regarding a product’s qualities, either ...