Hosted on MSN1d
Pepsi discontinues ‘permanent’ flavor, debuts a completely different one
Pepsi is planning to debut a brand-new flavor this month, marking its first “permanent” addition to the brand’s beverage ...
US lawsuit accuses PepsiCo of price discrimination that favored Walmart over smaller stores
A lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission alleges that food and beverage maker PepsiCo engaged in illegal price ...
Pepsi accused of illegal pricing deals with 'a large, big box retailer' in U.S. lawsuit
The Federal Trade Commission is suing Pepsi, alleging it has rigged competition by offering unfair pricing deals to a big retailer at the expense of smaller rivals, resulting in higher costs for ...
Pepsi has big news for soda-lovers: ‘It’s wild!’
Pepsi has pretty big news for people who love the soda (Coke fans, feel free to disregard this article). The brand will very ...
How food brands and drugmakers are responding to FDA's ban of food dye Red 3
Companies say they are working to update their products to comply with the Food and Drug Administration's decision Wednesday to ban the artificial food dye Red 3, after the agency said it was revoking ...
People on MSN8d
Pepsi's New Wild Cherry & Cream Soda Is Coming — Months After Coke Discontinued Similar Flavor
The latest permanent Pepsi drinks come just months after Coca-Cola discontinued its cherry vanilla flavor on Sept. 4. The ...
Pepsi Debuts ‘Creamy’ New Flavor, a Twist on Fan-Favorite Taste
Pepsi is introducing a brand-new twist on a fan-favorite flavor, and the company stresses its “permanent,” i.e. not just a ...
Coca-Cola And PepsiCo: Own Both Or Lose Big This Year
PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are both undervalued, and I foresee an appreciable upside in 2025. Click here to read why both PEP and ...
Love Nostalgic Sodas? You Need to Try Pepsi’s New Flavor
The original Pepsi Wild Cherry has been around since 1988, so it’s only natural that the brand would seek to put a distinctly ...
Pepsi hurt small businesses by giving big-box retailer financial advantages, the FTC claims
The commission alleges that the retailer, whose name was redacted in the statement from commissioners, received “unfair pricing advantages” that were not made available to others.