Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...
The environmental group had said the lawsuit, over its role in a protest movement, could mean an end to its operations in the ...
7don MSN
Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...
Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.
(The Center Square) – Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the ...
Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund — of colluding to promote acts including trespassing, violence ...
A North Dakota jury awarded $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company that runs the Dakota Access Pipeline, ...
Last week, a jury ruled that Greenpeace, a left-wing environmental activist group, must pay more than $660 million to Energy ...
James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...
A North Dakota jury on Wednesday found Greenpeace liable for millions of dollars in damages to a giant pipeline company in ...
Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET), one of the largest midstream companies in the U.S. with over 125,000 miles of pipeline across 44 ...
Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project. Greenpeace maintains that ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results